Tuesday, September 28, 2010

Morning

I didn't sleep much last night. I didn't sleep much because I didn't really want to BE asleep. The fact that I had to get up early this morning did nothing to discourage me from taking my time in going to bed. I think this is the way that life is meant to be. Why should I spend all of my time constantly worrying about when I have to get up in the morning, what I have to do tomorrow, where I will be next week? Isn't life meant to be lived in the moment?

I think the universe answered that question for me. This morning I awoke after a few short hours of sleep feeling more refreshed than I do when I sleep for half a day. I didn't have to spend the majority of the night preparing my body for today. Instead I did what I wanted to do, and everything worked out. Don't get me wrong, I love sleeping, but there are times when I would rather be doing other things. Like watching old episodes of Will & Grace or checking Facebook. You didn't really think I was going to mention doing homework, did you?

Here's hoping that today is an awesome day . . . Screw hope, let's make it a great one.

Friday, April 30, 2010

This is it . . . for now

I have come to the end of my blogging experience for the semester, and I have learned a lot. I always wanted to start a blog, but I never really had a reason to do it. This class gave me the opportunity to write and have my work read by anyone that comes across this page. It is a little scary to send something out to the world to see what they think about it, but its also exciting. I realize that no one really reads this other than the people in our class, but I still feel like I have broken out into a new world of writing.

I am planning on keeping up my blog in the future, but it will most likely take a slant towards politics, as that is the one subject that I never run out of opinions for. I am going to take a break for a little while, and come back refreshed and ready to spew my opinions. I warn you, if you aren't at least somewhat liberal-minded when it comes to politics, you may not want to read this blog. I have a tendency to be overly liberal, and while I respect the opinions of others, I don't always act like it. Who knows, maybe I will have a future in blogging about politics . . . I doubt it, but I can dream, can't I?

Thursday, April 29, 2010

So Close!

I can't believe that the semester is almost over. Today was really strange knowing that it was the last day of blogging. It made me think about the things I still have to finish, and how I can't wait to get it all over with. I always wish that the semester will be over right after it starts, but by the time summer vacation is over I am also always ready to go back. Going back after a break is always nice, because you get to see everyone again and it feels like you are making progress towards getting out of school. Now that I am so close to graduating, I feel mixed about summer vacation. While I am excited to sleep in and not worry about homework for most of the summer, I am kinda bummed that I can't keep plugging away at my classes. I want to be out of college, but summer vacation only adds three months to the wait time.

Saturday, April 24, 2010

I love this weather!

I know that many people like having sunny, warm weather all the time, but I have really been enjoying the weather that Nebraska has been experiencing lately. I love sunny weather, but I also really like rain and thunderstorms. I like having rain, sun, and thunderstorms all in the same day. This creates a variety that is characteristic of Nebraska weather. I am not a fan of this variety during the winter, when we can be teased with above freezing temperatures one minute, and then have a blizzard with below-zero temperatures. I have also been enjoying the weather lately because I can wear winter and spring clothes at the same time. I am not someone that likes wearing heavy coats, so its nice to be able to wear a jacket instead of something heavier.

This spring has also been much more enjoyable for me because it has had above average precipitation. I have really bad allergies, and usually spend the month of April sneezing and rubbing my eyes. This has not been the case this spring. I have been able to spend time outside without spending the next four days laying around with hay fever. The next time you think about complaining about the weather we are having this spring, think about the allergy sufferers that are receiving a well deserved break from seasonal allergy symptoms. This break has also helped my bank account, as I don't have to spend as much money on allergy medication.

Friday, April 23, 2010

Comedy Central has been castrated


Yesterday I wrote about how the creators of South Park had received death threats from a Muslim extremist group, and had altered this weeks episode to bleep out all mentions of Muhammad. This morning I read that the episode was not censored by the creators of South Park, but by Comedy Central itself.

Matt and Trey, the creators of South Park, made a statement that they were unhappy with how Comedy Central handled the situation. I have to agree with their point of view. It seems ridiculous to me that the network would censor the show against the wishes of the people who created it. Trey and Matt were the people who were directly threatened by the Muslim extremists, not Comedy Central. I would understand if the people threatened would want to give in to the wishes of the group, but I really don't think it was Comedy Central's place to censor the episode for them.

I have always liked the fact that Comedy Central was unafraid to ruffle the feathers of it's viewers, but this all changed today. I am extremely disappointed in the network. There are many times when I am offended by the nature of their programming, but that doesn't keep me from watching. I understand the concept of the network, and I don't go off the deep end when they make fun of things that hit close to home for me. I guess the terrorists really have won. I used to think that Comedy Central had balls, but I guess the terrorists chopped them off.

Thursday, April 22, 2010

What the bleep?

It is no secret that many people feel offended by the characters and events portrayed on South Park, but most people know not to take the show seriously. This is obviously not true of Muslim extremist groups. I was watching CNN yesterday afternoon when they were talking about death threats that had been made to the creators of South Park due to their depiction of the prophet Muhammad on last weeks 200th episode.

When I saw this, I wasn't surprised, but I was very surprised when I watched South Park last night. The creators of the show have never worried about what people think about their depiction of different cultures, but this time it seems to have caused them to think twice. When I watched last night, all mentions of Muhammad in the episode were bleeped out. There was also a large portion of the end of the show that was bleeped due to what can only be assumed as anti-Muslim remarks. Although it must have been somewhat frightening to receive death threats from a group of Muslim extremists, I am surprised that it caused the creators of the show to censor themselves.

This led me to wonder whether the censorship was intentional on the part of South Park. When watching the episode, the bleeping actually makes the viewer more aware of the comments, which is what I think the creators were going for. They are fighting back by technically giving in to the demands of the people threatening them while making sure that the public is well aware of the comments the characters in the show are making. If the bleeps were intentional on the part of South Park, and not a result of the death threats, I think they should be applauded for their creativity. If not, I am a little disappointed that they gave in to people who are dumb enough to let themselves get angry about a cartoon completely based on nonsense.

Sunday, April 18, 2010

How does she do it? - Final Draft

I have used many different words to refer to my mom over the years, but negative has never been one of them. I have never met someone that could be more positive than my mom, to the point of being downright annoying at times.


When I asked why she was so positive all the time, my mom responded by asking me what complaining really did for my daily life. She mentioned that the only thing complaining has ever done is made things worse, so she prefers to look on the bright side of things. She takes on the role of motivator in our family, because both my dad and I spend a large amount of time whining about our lives instead of trying to make them better. I asked her the other day how she stayed positive when she was around the two of us, and she said sometimes she fakes it. She admitted that there are days when listening to our problems makes her want to scream, but she knows that we need someone to vent to.


My mom never vents to anyone, and the reason for this is that she really doesn’t have anything to vent about. My mom doesn’t let things get to her like most people do. I worked at the same store as her when I was in high school, and I often witnessed her handling difficult customers with an ease that baffled me. Someone could be incredibly rude to her and my mom would still walk away with a smile on her face. She insists that people who try to bring you down to their own level of negativity aren’t worth your time or energy. This doesn’t mean she avoids them, but she refuses to let negative people get a reaction out of her.


Having a great attitude comes naturally to my mom, and she attracts people to her like a magnet. When she finally convinced me to create a Facebook page for her, my mom added more friends in a week than I did in over a year. She now spends part of her day looking through her friends’ pages and ‘liking’ their status updates. This may seem like a waste of time to some people, but making others feel appreciated is something that my mom takes very seriously. Every card or gift she receives causes my mom to go into a long round of “thank-yous” and “you shouldn’t haves.” My mom believes that people who know you appreciate them are more likely to be positive about life, which makes being around them a more pleasant experience.


The one piece of advice that my mom gave me about staying positive is the use of body language. She believes that if you keep a smile on your face at all times people will be more likely to smile back, which improves your mood, even if you weren’t really happy in the first place. Learning all of these things about my mom makes me wonder how often she really is happy, and how often she fakes it. In the long run it really doesn’t matter, because faking it leads to the real deal.


We can all take an example from my mom and others like her. There is always someone else on Earth that is going through something ten times worse than we are, and instead of feeling bad for ourselves, we should try to create a positive atmosphere that doesn’t allow negative feelings to develop. So the next time you are annoyed by someone you think is overly happy, think about how you can be more like them instead of how crazy you think they are.

Thursday, April 15, 2010

Mom knows her stuff

I was talking to my mom the other day about being more positive, and she gave me some great advice. I asked her about positivity because she has always been the one person that I could count on to have a great attitude. There has never been a situation that my mom didn't seem able to handle, and she always keeps her cool under pressure. This can't be said for my dad, who is one of the most pessimistic people I know. I think I received equal amounts of the positive and pessimist genes, because it all depends on the day of the week in my case.

My mom talked about how she has always been so positive, and I was surprised by what she said. She mentioned that when she was growing up, her family didn't have a lot. Her mom died when she was only four, and she was forced to grow up quickly. Her lack of a childhood would make many people bitter, but my mom doesn't look back on it with a negative attitude. She instead mentioned that never having something makes it impossible to miss having it. She doesn't really remember anything about her mom, so she never had something to miss. She accepted the situation that was placed in front of her and made the best of it. I am not sure that I would have done the same thing in her situation.

I think my mom was given a special personality, because she is able to deal with extremely difficult situations and people without becoming negative. Two of these people are myself and my dad. I was most certainly not the model child, and I continue to challenge her patience. I think that my dad is actually taking my place as the child, because he seems to always have something going on that my mom has to deal with. He would be the last person to admit it, but he relies heavily on my mom to be the positive influence in his life. I also still rely on my mom to give me advice and listen to my ramblings. Thanks, Mom!

Tuesday, April 13, 2010

The Power of Positivity

There is something to be said about people who are constantly positive. I have never been one of these people, but I have noticed that they seem to be happier in general. This makes a lot of sense if you think about it, because they don't let the little things in life get them down. I have always been someone that claims to be positive until something difficult comes along, and then I think its better to complain about it than try to solve it.

My current situation is one that shows me how much a positive attitude could really do for me. I have a lot of stuff left to complete before the end of the semester, which I constantly think and complain about. What I should really do is have a good attitude and try to get it all done and think about how soon I will be free for a few months. It just seems much easier to complain and put the work off as long as possible.

I hate looking on Facebook and seeing that one person that updates their status about getting all of their homework done for the rest of the semester. Am I the only one that wants to punch them in the face? Maybe you are really on top of things, but don't rub it in my face. Being prepared doesn't make you any better than me . . . Ok, maybe it does, but you don't have to be all smug about it.

I prefer to use my Facebook status for talking about how stressed I am, or how much work I still have to do before class the next day. Just let me have my pity party in peace without having to see you brag about being on top of things.

I just went off on a rant about how much I hate people that do this, but what I should really be doing is attempting to be more like them. If I was positive about things and focused on getting the job done, I would already be bragging on Facebook and waiting for the semester to end peacefully. I don't know if there is hope for me becoming a more positive person, but I think the area of homework is a good place for me to start.

Saturday, April 10, 2010

Go Away, Bieber!

I can remember my parents thinking that the music that I listened to when I was in middle and high school was strange, but I like to think that it was better than the stuff that adolescents are listening to now. I work with kids on a regular basis, and I hear them talk about the new songs that they like to listen to. Some of them are absolutely awful.

I fail to see how people can like Justin Bieber. I think he sounds like an 8 year-old with speech issues. I have never heard of another Canadian that talks like he grew up in inner-city Detroit. As soon as I heard him say shawty for the first time I knew he was going on my list of least favorite singers. My friend Katie was talking to me about him the other night, and brought up how complex his lyrics are . . . not. If you can repeat the word baby 1,000 times in a song and make it a hit, I guess young people really are dumber than I thought.

When I think about it, I guess I feel sorry for Justin Bieber. What is he going to do when he finally goes through puberty and loses his 8 year-old voice? He will have the same fate as groups like Hanson, who were no longer popular once they grew up. I can only hope this is what happens to Bieber. I guess there is one thing good about Justin Bieber . . . I really like watching people make fun of him, like they do in this video parody.

Pothole Problem


Winter in Nebraska is a time of constant weather change. It can be almost 50 degrees one day, and a blizzard with below zero temperatures the next. This takes a toll on our roads, and leaves us with huge craters in the streets by the time spring arrives. The roads department is usually fairly quick about getting out and filling these potholes, but I am sure there are many reasons that they may not get to them immediately. They have coffee break, for instance, or they need to take a vacation day . . . I understand.

When driving around Kearney I noticed several potholes on major roads, but there was nothing that I couldn't easily dodge around. This was not the case when I went to see my parents in Grand Island. There are so many potholes on the roads in GI that it was almost impossible not to hit at least one on each street. The streets in GI have always been crap, but I think this year is one for the record books. While driving through the sycamore street underpass, I tried to avoid a pothole that looked at least a foot deep and two feet wide, but there was no way I could without hitting the side of the underpass or sideswiping another car. This caused me to slam into the pothole, and possibly do damage to my car. I know the street department is busy, but for crying out loud, if there is a hole in a place that makes it unavoidable to hit, please fix it.

The City of Grand Island has never ceased to amaze me with their ingenious way of investing absolutely no money or effort into the roads. I remember a few years ago when instead of filling in potholes on one of the main roads near my parents house, they simply laid a giant piece of plywood on top of them. While this may have made the road a little smother, I think we should just embrace the crappy roads and take an example from the cartoon posted above. Fishing, anyone?

Wednesday, April 7, 2010

The Asian Whitney Houston??

I came across this video on YouTube and I was instantly amazed. This 10 year-old boy from Taiwan sounds exactly like Whitney Houston. I didn't know whether to applaud or wet myself laughing. Ok . . . I laughed . . . hysterically. There is just something about an Asian boy singing Whitney that gets to me. I think he sings this song better than Whitney could nowadays. This makes me hate American Idol even more than I have lately. I wish America had some overweight Asian children to sing power ballads on Idol instead of the crap that has been coming out of the contestants mouths the past few weeks.

Saturday, April 3, 2010

Competing for attention - Final Draft

The Nebraska Baseball season is in full swing, but unfortunately the lack of swinging bats has caused a drop in public interest as well. This change is a complete contrast to the enthusiasm that the people of Nebraska had for the potential of the team a few years ago. This drop in support has been seen in a number of sports over the years, and is characteristic of the way most Nebraskans view all sports other than football.

I started following Nebraska Baseball in 2005, just as they were beginning to be noticed on the national stage. They went to the College World Series that year but were unable to advance far in the tournament. The following two years were successful for the Huskers. They made it to regional play both seasons, and the public responded to this success by creating a buzz about the sport and packing Haymarket Park for nearly every home game.

2008 and 2009 proved to be very difficult for the Huskers, and they failed to qualify for regional play last season. This was disappointing as a Husker fan, but a period of success is usually followed by a few years of rebuilding. The talent of the players has not been on the same level as it was a few years ago, which has led to fewer wins.

No one likes to lose, but sometimes there just isn’t a lot you can do to stop it. Over the past few years I have watched as the hardworking players have given their all only to lose game after game. This hard work should be applauded, but the opposite is happening. Most fans have either turned their back on the sport, or are calling for Coach Mike Anderson to resign.

It is unfortunate that so many fans are willing to stop going to games and supporting the team just because they aren’t winning the majority of their games like they have in past seasons. It makes you wonder what made Nebraska Football stay so popular even when they had several lackluster seasons under Bill Callahan.

I think the main factor in the prominence of Nebraska Football is its long winning tradition. The other sports are left to compete for the small amount of enthusiasm left over from the football season. Right now the sport of choice seems to be Women’s Basketball, but this was not the case in the past. Volleyball has also been a fan favorite over the past few years. This can change at the drop of a hat, or at the drop of a winning season. Nebraskans don’t like to lose, but they are much more patient with the football team than with other sports. I am also guilty of this double standard.

While many were extremely upset with the direction the football team was heading under Callahan, they stuck with the team due to their attachment to the sport. This attachment hasn’t occurred with other sports, because there has never been enough attention focused on them. This needs to change. We need to show all athletes that what they are doing is just as important as the quarterback of the football team.

I understand how disappointing it is to go to a game and watch the team you are cheering for lose, but does that mean you should stop cheering? It seems to me that the team needs to know that the public supports them in a rough time like this more than ever. That’s why I will be listening or watching every game that the Huskers play this season. When Nebraska wins the College World Series I want to be able to say that I was a fan before they were great.

Thursday, April 1, 2010

Happy Birthday!


Today is my 22nd birthday. I am not a big birthday person, but it is nice to have one day when you are the center of attention. I do have to admit that I was excited to have a birthday that wasn't a major milestone. It seems like there are so many milestone years when you are growing up, but once you pass the 21 year mark there just isn't anything to celebrate. You then only have the birthdays that make you feel older and older to look forward to.


I had a lot of fun on my birthday last year, but this year its nice to just kick back and enter the boring stage of my 20s. I like that there is nothing special about this birthday. Being a twenty-something means that I am no longer a child, but I can still act like one from time to time. I have all of the perks of being an adult without having to be completely mature. I'm not sure if I will ever really be mature, but I don't know if thats really a bad thing. I think that people get so wrapped up in adult life that they forget about all of the things that they used to get joy out of as kids.


Aging brings with it aches and pains, but it also brings distance between who you currently are and who you once were. I think that we should hold on to who we used to be, even if it wasn't ideal. It is important to remember where we came from, because without the past there is no future. As I look back at my younger years I have no regrets, but I also have many things that I want to do in the future. Right now I think I will just kick back and enjoy being a lazy 22 college student for a while longer. Before I know it I will be celebrating my 30th birthday.

Monday, March 29, 2010

Bad Seasons = More Tickets


First off, I think it is only fair that I admit how disappointing the beginning of the season has been for the Nebraska Baseball team. They haven't been able to dominate in games when they are ahead in the beginning, and they often score runs but are unable to get back into the game before the other team pulls further ahead. Despite my own feelings about the team, I think that it is sad to watch how public support slowly disappears when teams are not winning games.

When I first started going to Nebraska games with my dad in 2005 the team was on the way up. They had been in the College World Series before, but 2005 was the break-out year for the Huskers. We were able to get single game tickets for reserved seating in 2005, but we were unable to get tickets for anything other than grass berm seating for the next three years. This was because the team was still able to win games and attract the attention to people with enough money to throw away on season tickets. I personally think that there should always be tickets held back for single-game use, but the athletic department would rather collect donation money. I suppose I can't really blame them for that, but it is aggravating when you are forced to sit on wet grass all the time.

To get back to my point, the past few years have been rough for the Huskers. They haven't been good enough to get to the CWS, and last year they didn't even qualify for regional play. This has led to an abundance of single tickets being available. While I appreciate being able to get good seats, it makes me sad that people have been so quick to drop their season tickets. If I had enough money to waste on season tickets anyway, I would keep them through the good and bad seasons. I worry that the same thing that has happened to the baseball team will happen when women's basketball and volleyball are no longer as good as they are currently. As much as I hate to admit it, Nebraska is a one sport state. Football will always be the one sport that fans will stick with through good and bad. This makes it harder for the other sports to compete. People like to say that winning isn't everything, but if you live in Nebraska it is. If you lose and you aren't the football team, you are in danger of getting cut off from the public's donations and their attention.

Saturday, March 27, 2010

Differences in Opinion

Over the past week there have been many people that have voiced their opinions on the changes being made to our health care system. Political talk shows and news programs have been full of rhetoric and fighting between both sides of the issue. I think it is interesting to see how different people see the changes in health care in completely different ways. One way to do this without listening to screaming people on television is to look at political cartoons. I like looking at the cartoons instead, because they not only tell you how people feel about the issue, but they also make you laugh. It is nice to have a lighter approach to learning the opinions of others. While many of these cartoons do not align with my own beliefs, I still think they are fun to look at. I would have to say that if there was one cartoon that I agreed with and enjoyed the most, it would be the last one.





Friday, March 26, 2010

Howard Beale and Glenn Beck


While watching the film Network, I was interested to see all of the similarities between the character of Howard Beale and Glenn Beck from Fox News. I know that Dr. Hanson had said that Glenn Beck likes to compare himself to Howard Beale, but I was a little surprised to see how similar they really are to one another. Both men are in my mind absolutely crazy, and scream about the world ending and how awful people have become due to the problems around us. I think that Glenn Beck is spot on when comparing himself to Beale because he is at least as crazy as Beale, if not more so.

I also think that the way that UBS was trying to capture ratings by using a personality like Beale is similar to what Fox News and other news outlets are doing today. It is not uncommon to turn to a news channel and see someone yelling about their own opinions on an issue while stretching the truth. I think that Glenn Beck is the perfect example of someone trying to mislead the public into believing in his own agenda. I think men like Glenn Beck are extremely dangerous, because there are so many people out there that only believe what they hear on television. When programs like the Howard Beale Show and the Glenn Beck Program throw things way out of proportion it is easy to get people stirred up.

I thought the parts of Network where Beale would pass out on the air were hilarious. It is just like a television network to exploit something like that to get people to watch their programming. It is all about having something that the other networks don't have, which is why we see so many different types of people on the different channels. I think that the character of Diana is a perfect example of most of the people working in television today. She is the head of programming, which has been carried over to the news side of the network. She sees an opportunity in Beale to make UBS a more successful network. He may be unstable, but he can make the network a lot of money. That is what it all comes down to: Television networks want to make as big of a profit as possible. That is why people like Glenn Beck are so prevalent on television. Even if they don't agree with what he has to say, many people tune in to see what crazy thing is going to come out of his mouth.

It actually makes me happy that Glenn Beck compares himself to Howard Beale. It gives me hope that he too will have a downfall. I of course don't mean to suggest that I hope he has the same end as Beale, because that is something that a crazy person like Beck would say. I just have hope that one day people will finally see that he is a complete lunatic that needs to be taken off the air. The only way to accomplish this is to stop watching his program. As long as Fox News is getting the ratings, Beck will stay on the air. I also think that a network like Fox would be willing to take a hit like UBS did to keep pushing their extremely conservative agenda. Here's hoping that the Glenn Beck Program proves to be as much of a failure as the Howard Beale Show.

Tuesday, March 23, 2010

If you really want to save money . . .


Everyone in the country has most likely received their 2010 Census form in the mail within the past week. There should have also been a letter sent to each home about a week before the form arrived. This letter was telling you that you would be getting a form in the mail within a week, and that you needed to fill it out when it arrived. Like most responsible citizens, I immediately filled out my form and sent it back in the same day that I received it, expecting to be done with anything having to do with the 2010 Census.

Yesterday, I got home and checked my mail like I always do. I was surprised to see a postcard in my box from none other than the US Census Bureau. This postcard was to remind me that I should have received my census form after receiving a letter telling me I would receive a census form, and that I needed to make sure to send this form in. After throwing the postcard in the trash I thought about how much it must cost to send one of those postcards to every residence in the nation. I know that the postal service is part of the government, so technically they don't have to pay the postage, but they do have to pay for the manpower and energy to get that postcard to my house.

If we are in a time of financial crisis, why is the government sending each residence a postcard within days of sending the census form? They have no idea whether or not I sent the form in, but if they waited a few days they would find that my form had arrived, and they would not need to waste the money to send me a reminder. I know that sending a letter is cheaper than going door to door, which is why I think sending reminders is a good idea in general. I'm just saying to wait and see who sends the forms back before wasting the postage. I am no financial guru, but I would think that if you calculated the amount of postage it would take to send everyone an unnecessary follow-up postcard, you would end up with a lot of money. We could use this money for other things, like fixing roads, funding education, or even writing me a check to pay for increased garbage pick-up for having to throw away all the crap they send me.

Saturday, March 20, 2010

Are small towns really safer?

I grew up in Grand Island, but I consider it to be a rather small community. I know that it is on the verge of becoming the third metro area in Nebraska, but I hardly think that having over 50,000 people makes Grand Island a thriving metropolis. When I was growing up, I used to think that I would spend my entire life in Grand Island. There was nothing that Grand Island didn't have that I couldn't live without.

As I grew older I started to realize that there was a world outside of Grand Island and Nebraska, and that I wanted to explore it. I have never really traveled to big cities like New York, but I am sure that there are a lot of good and bad things about living in a city that large. It would be nice to have everything you could think of at your fingertips, but there are a lot of problems with living in the city as well. Many people point out the crime that takes place in larger cities, but I have to disagree with the fact that this only happens in large cities. Over the past few years crime has been increasing dramatically in Grand Island and the surrounding areas. I was raised to think that cities like Omaha were full of crime, but now I read the news and see just as many stories about crime in places like Grand Island as cities like Omaha.

Since moving to Kearney a few years ago I have also seen several events that make Kearney look less safe as well. Crime knows no bounds. There is no way to keep crime completely out of an area, but many people seem to think that rural Nebraska is safe from crime. I urge these people to open their eyes to what is going on around them. I know some people that live in the country and leave their doors unlocked and their keys in the ignition of their cars. Unless you want your house broken into and your car stolen, you should stop being so naive.

Friday, March 19, 2010

Poor Sandra

I was disgusted to hear the other day that Jesse James cheated on his wife, Sandra Bullock. Who in their right mind would cheat on Sandra? I guess that answers the question: Jesse James is crazy. He had one of the biggest celebrities, and one of the nicest, but he threw it all away for a trashy stripper. It is even worse seeing all of this happen to Sandra after hearing her acceptance speech at the Oscars two weeks ago. She made sure to thank her husband for everything he had done for her, and mentioned how happy they were together. Obviously one of them wasn't happy. I can't say I am surprised that this happened, because I have always thought Jesse James was a dirtball. Anyone who looks that trashy all the time obviously has something wrong with them. I guess I never understood how someone like Sandra Bullock could be interested in him in the first place.

The trashy skank that Jesse had an affair with is named Michelle McGee. She is a porn star with enough tattoos to rival the owner of a tattoo parlor. She recently made herself look even classier by posing for a Nazi-themed photo shoot. One of the photos has her wearing a Nazi bikini, a swastika armband, and licking a knife. The pictures can be found on the TMZ website, but I don't want that ugly woman on my blog. I feel terrible for Sandra, but I can't help but think she is much better off without Jesse. He obviously has something missing upstairs if he is willing to throw away Sandra for a piece of trash like Michelle McGee.

Wednesday, March 17, 2010

What's with Idol this year?


I have been an American Idol fan for a long time, and I have never watched a season as boring as this one. There are no contestants that really stand out to me, and I honestly wouldn't care if any of them won. There are a few that have good voices and are good performers, but they are nothing compared to some of the past contestants.

I think maybe the main reason that I don't like Idol this year is because I thought last year was so great. With people like Adam Lambert and Kris Allen it was hard to choose who should win. I think that this year will end up being an obvious choice, because the only person that appears capable of being the winner is Siobhan Magnus. I hope for the sake of the show that some of the other contestants step it up and giver her some competition.

There is one other thing that makes me yawn when watching Idol: Ellen Degeneres. I am a big fan of Ellen. I think she is absolutely hilarious, but she doesn't have what it takes to be on Idol. I have a hard time listening to her criticism, because I really don't see how she has the credentials to give advice about singing. I really don't see how Idol has much of a future next season when Simon leaves. He is the main reason I watch the show. Hopefully they can find someone just as harsh and entertaining as he is to fill his spot. Here's hoping that Idol can get it together and avoid going off into the sunset.

Friday, March 12, 2010

When my respect runs out - Final Draft

I was raised under the belief that each person has the right to their own opinions. I may not always agree with what other people think, but I always respect their opinions. I have never liked Sarah Palin, but I have done my best to respect her personal views. This ended recently, as I learned more information about her views on health care reform.


It is understandable that people who have no experience with socialized medicine would be skeptical about making changes to our current health care system. Most people in the United States have had little or no contact with socialized medicine, but one person who has is Sarah Palin. While speaking to an audience in Calgary last week, Palin admitted that her family used to take advantage of Canadian healthcare instead of using medical facilities near their home in Alaska.


I don’t understand how someone whose family used socialized medicine by choice could label all forms of socialized health care as evil. Palin’s family obviously must have thought that Canadian health care was less evil than the health care offered to them in Alaska. There must have been some major flaws in the health care they were receiving in Alaska if they decided to dash across the border for different care.


I would be hard pressed to view a system as evil if my family had benefited from it in many ways. Palin has never backed down from her stance that socialized medicine, and anything else that has the word socialized in front of it, is the worst possible choice for America. I guess I think that the worst possible choice for America is letting many of its citizens live without health insurance, praying that they don’t get sick. Of course, this wouldn’t matter to someone like Palin, who has enough money to pay for any medical procedure that she or any other member of her family might need.


One person that Palin would not have to pay for is her grandson Tripp. Tripp is covered by the Indian Health Service because he is the descendant of the Yup'ik Eskimo people. The IHS is a form of government-run health care, which is exactly what Palin is so strongly in opposition to. It is strange to think that she would allow her own grandson to rely on this health care plan when she certainly has enough money to buy high priced insurance for him.


Maybe I shouldn’t be so bothered by these two facts when looking at Sarah Palin’s views on health care reform, but I think that I have a right to be upset. It is one thing to be in opposition to something that you believe is wrong, but it is another to oppose something that you have personally benefited from, and that your family is currently using. The fact that these two pieces of information were uncovered months after Palin started ranting about health care reform is also interesting. Why not tell us upfront about your history with the system, and explain why you think it’s wrong? Oh, I forgot, politicians don’t like to tell the truth until they are backed into a corner.


I will still stand by the values that my parents raised me with, and continue to respect the opinions of others. However, I will no longer listen to people like Sarah Palin, who tell me that what I believe is wrong because they know better, when they are in fact being hypocritical. Sarah Palin can scream from the mountaintops about her views on health care, but I am no longer listening. Not that I was really listening very carefully anyway.

Thursday, March 11, 2010

Hypocrite Alert!!

While further investigating Sarah Palin's comments on the evils of socialized medicine I ran across an article that looks into the fact that Palin's grandson Tripp is covered by a government-paid health care plan. As a descendant of the Yup'ik Eskimo people, Tripp is eligible to be included in the Indian Health Service, which pays for health care with government dollars. The article goes on to ask questions about Sarah Palin's hypocritical actions when it comes to health care reform. If Palin truly believes that socialized medicine is "evil," why does she allow her grandson to be covered by a plan that would be similar to what all Americans could be included in if health care reform were passed? Palin certainly has enough money to pay for health insurance for her grandson, but she is willing to let him use government paid health care.

If I strongly opposed socialized medicine, and had the financial resources of someone like Sarah Palin, there is no way that I would allow someone in my family to rely on a health care plan like the Indian Health Service. It would go against everything I believed in. Learning this information has only increased my frustration with the fact that Sarah Palin is such a strong opponent of changing health care. She not only benefited from socialized medicine in Canada when she was young, but her own family takes advantage of tribal health benefits. Something smells fishy here. Either Palin isn't as opposed to government-run health insurance as she says she is, or she really doesn't care too much about keeping her family members from the "evils" of socialized medicine.

Wednesday, March 10, 2010

If it was good enough for you then . . .


Sarah Palin gave a speech in Calgary over the weekend where she acknowledged that her family used to cross the border into Canada to receive medical treatment when she was younger. I found this interesting, because Sarah Palin is one of the biggest opponents of socialized medicine. This article talks about how she has formerly done nothing but bash Canadian health care and the proposed health care plan of President Obama as "evil." I find it strange that Palin would wait until now to mention that her family had taken advantage of Canadian health care when she has been constantly bashing the proposed health care plan in the United States. I know that politicians withhold information all the time, but it still bothers me when it comes out.

I understand that it was not Sarah Palin's choice to go to Canada for health care when she was a child, but it was her choice to leave out that she had actually received good treatment from a socialized health care system. She made the choice to accuse socialized medicine as being bad when she knew for a fact that it obviously wasn't all bad, considering how much it helped her family. Maybe I'm just making a big deal out of this because I think Sarah Palin is a psycho, but is anyone else bothered by this? If universal health care was good enough for you when you were young, what makes you too good for it now?

Monday, March 8, 2010

Nebraska has had quite a run lately


There are few times when Nebraska gets attention in the world of sports and entertainment, but there have been several events in the past few weeks that have put Nebraska in the public eye:

1. Nebraska Women's Basketball team completes an undefeated regular season at 29-0.

2. Nebraska native Curtis Tomasevicz helps the US Olympic Team win their first gold medal in bobsledding since 1948.

3. Papillion resident Mauro Fiore wins an Oscar for cinematography for his work on the film "Avatar."

I know that in a state like New York or California having events like these take place wouldn't be uncommon, but in a state like Nebraska they are special. Most people outside of the Midwest don't hear much about Nebraska, and having three events like this take place may not make Nebraska seem more important on a national scale, but they may cause more people to take notice. Whether or not people from other states notice, Nebraskans are certainly happy about these accomplishments. Personally, it was nice to watch the Olympics and have someone from my own state to cheer for, and it will be cool seeing Nebraska playing in some big games as the postseason starts for basketball. While Fiore's Oscar win is most likely the least well known of these three events, I think it is one of the most important. It shows that Nebraskans are more than just farmers, and they can beat out others from all over the world in fields like cinematography.

Saturday, March 6, 2010

I miss you, Ernie.

Over the past two years there has been one thing keeping me from watching what happens in Lincoln: the lack of Ernie Chambers. I may face ridicule for this statement, but I think Senator Chambers is absolutely brilliant. He was one of the only people in the Legislature that was willing to risk his reputation to stand up for what he believed in. I used to watch live coverage of the Unicameral just to see what Senator Chambers would say or do. Now all I have to look forward to is watching a bunch of nearly dead white men from the rural parts of the state fight with the few progressive senators from the urban parts of the state. The vibrancy that Senator Chambers brought to Nebraska politics can never be matched.

Senator Chambers managed to be constructive and entertaining at the same time. He would yell, sing, dance, and do whatever else it took to get people to pay attention to him whenever he had the floor in the Unicameral. He was extremely effective at his job, and while many thought that he was a rude person because of his attitude, he was more than willing to help other senators with their bills. He was also great about talking to groups of students about becoming more involved in government. I was in one of these groups, and his speech caused me to change the way I thought about state government. Chambers was notorious for doing whatever he needed to in order to make his point, including suing God. While I know that government is not meant to be seen as entertainment, it sure makes it easier to pay attention to.

Best Picture or Best Title?

While reading this article from CNN.com, I became interested in the way that Oscar winners are chosen. It is mentioned that the winners are often very predictable. The winner of Best Picture is harder to predict, but the article mentions that the movie with the most appealing title is often the winner. If this is true, than a movie could be awful, but it could win over an extremely popular movie if it had a good enough title. I think someone should test out this theory by making a complete bomb of a film and giving it an excellent title.

I am not a fan of the Oscars, and I usually don't watch them, but I may watch a few minutes this year to see the winner of Best Picture.

The Nominees:
"Avatar"
"The Blind Side"
"District 9"
"An Education"
"The Hurt Locker"
"Inglourious Basterds"
"Precious"
"A Serious Man"
"Up"
"Up in the Air"

I have only seen two of the nominees, but I think that makes me qualified to choose the winner if it is based upon the title. I find it hard to believe that the title really makes a difference, but if that was true, I would think that a film like "Inglorious Basterds" would win. I highly doubt this film will win, and I think "Precious" will take the award. I guess I will find out tomorrow . . . unless I find something better to do.

Wednesday, March 3, 2010

Sleep is overrated


I have noticed over the past year that my sleep habits have changed a lot. I used to go to bed pretty early, and if I stayed up later than 11 it was a big deal. I now almost never go to bed before 11, and I often stay up until almost 1 in the morning when I have to get up at 6 or 7. Every morning I feel like total crap when I get up, and I vow that I will go to bed at a decent time that night. I then end up staying awake until at least midnight again. I think it is strange how you can be so tired the entire day, but when you get home at night you find a million things to do other than go to bed. I don't usually feel tired when I go to bed, but it is a completely different story the next day. I'm not a coffee drinker, so I usually end up looking and feeling like I am half dead for the entire day. It is a vicious cycle and I don't know how to break out of it. I don't know if I really want to either.

Sunday, February 28, 2010

Nebraska's weather isn't so bad

Sometimes I think about how much I hate living in Nebraska, but then something happens that makes me realize that it may not be all bad. Yesterday as I watched all of the coverage on CNN about the earthquake in Chile and the possible tsunami moving toward Hawaii, I realized that maybe Hawaii isn't as great as I thought it was. I have always thought it would be great to live somewhere like Hawaii. I would like to live right by the ocean and have warm weather all year long, but I don't know if I would be willing to have to worry about tsunamis, hurricanes, mudslides, earthquakes, and all of the other things that seem to plague all of the warm places near the ocean.

I'm not saying that this changes my opinion on Nebraska's weather. I still think Nebraska is a pile of crap when it comes to weather most of the year. I do enjoy spring and early summer here, but that doesn't make the winters or extremely humid summers worth it to me. I know that many people from other areas are deathly afraid of tornadoes, and are convinced that if they come to the Midwest they will die by being carried away by one, but that really doesn't scare me. I suppose that if I was forced to choose between a place like Nebraska where the weather is generally crappy but not enough to kill me, and somewhere near the coasts where the weather is nice but I might fall through a crack in the earth, get carried away by a wave, or lose my house to a mudslide, I would choose Nebraska.

Friday, February 26, 2010

Get all the facts before deciding on hospital issue - Final Draft

By Matt Kovar


The Kearney City Council is facing a huge decision in the next few weeks with the proposal to build a new physician-run hospital near Yanney Park. There are many people on both sides of the issue that have expressed their opinions, but even more are still undecided on the issue. Both sides are new attempting to sway the undecided to support their cause. Unfortunately, many of the people trying to create opposition against the proposed Kearney Regional Hospital are not telling the truth.


One of the biggest reasons that citizens of Kearney have voiced opposition for the new hospital is its proposed location near Yanney Park. Many have stated that it would cause increased traffic congestion in the area. Eleventh Street has already been widened to four lanes in the area where the hospital would be built, and the widening project will likely extend westward as growth continues. If a four-lane street is good enough to handle traffic on a highway it is certainly capable of handling the traffic of a small hospital. The location has also been debated due to its status as a residential area. Almost all land annexed into a city is at first zoned as residential, and is later changed for other uses. Rezoning this land would not be a radical step, it would actually be typical. It is understandable why some people living near the area would object to a hospital being built in their backyard, but the reality of the situation is that if the hospital isn’t built than something else will come along to take its place. Kearney is going to continue to grow, and we will eventually have to expand out into these green areas.


There have been citizens that have voiced opposition to any for-profit hospital being built in Kearney, because it would cause shareholders to charge higher rates to make a profit. In general, for-profit hospitals encourage innovation and efficiency, which lowers medical costs. While there would be a group of shareholders making a profit off of the hospital, the same thing is going on with Good Samaritan Hospital (GSH). Catholic Health Initiatives (CHI), which runs 75 hospitals and 40 long-term care facilities in 19 states including GSH, actually make quite a profit while being considered a non-profit. CHI is worth around $12 billion, and doesn’t have to disclose where the money coming from Good Samaritan goes. This money has not been reinvested in making medical care better for Kearney residents, but has instead gone back into the pockets of CHI.


GSH and its non-disgruntled employees have stated that a second hospital would cause a decline in the quality of health care for the area. How can having options in where you go for health care be a bad thing? Having two hospitals would increase competition and cause both hospitals to look for new ways to attract patients and make health care better for Kearney residents. Good Samaritan is claiming the opposite of this because CHI doesn’t want to have to invest more money and effort into competing with another hospital. It is not about the quality of care, but the loss of a monopoly on health care.


Kearney residents must look past the negative comments about the proposed hospital and look at all of the information on the issue. When it comes down to it, there isn’t much of a reason to block the building of Kearney Regional Hospital. There is nothing wrong with opposing the hospital, but it is important to have all of the facts first.

Tuesday, February 23, 2010

Hadley sends a mixed message on hospital issue

I have been doing some research on the new physician-owned hospital that has been proposed to be built near Yanney Park. One of the interesting aspects of the issue to me was the opinion that State Senator Galen Hadley of Kearney has given on the issue. While Hadley claims on his website that he is neither supporting or opposing the bill at this time, his actions show otherwise. In the Kearney Hub article Hospital moratorium bill hearing set for Wednesday in Lincoln, it is mentioned that although he did not introduce the bill, Hadley played a role in drawing up the legislation.

Maybe it's just me, but I don't think I would spend my time contributing to a bill that I wasn't supporting. Hadley is trying to avoid taking a stand on the issue when he has already clearly done so. It is also necessary to mention that Hadley is a former member of the Good Samaritan Board of Directors. He was also appointed to the Catholic Health Initiatives Nebraska panel, but resigned after people tuned into the fact that he was biased due to his affiliation with them. You can resign from all of the panels you want, but the fact remains that your affiliation with a group does not end simply because you are no longer formally attached to it.

Hadley has a major history with Good Samaritan Hospital, and it appears to be a positive one. If Hadley is on the side of Good Samaritan than he is on the side that supports LB999. I think that most Nebraskans would find it much more respectable if Hadley would come out and voice his support for the bill instead of pretending to be impartial. Honesty is a good quality, and one that is rarely found in politicians. If Hadley had the guts to stand up for what he believes in than he wouldn't have to mislead the public in an effort to calm both sides of the hospital debate.

Saturday, February 20, 2010

The battle for a new hospital

When reading the article Planners hand back hospital issue to council in the Kearney Hub I was interested to see the varying extremes of opinion on the issue. Many people interviewed in the article are obviously biased due to their positions in the community. Most of the people who were not connected with Good Samaritan Hospital and Catholic Health Initiatives appear to be at least willing to consider the benefits of another hospital in Kearney.

Janice Wiebusch of Kearney was quoted as opposing the new hospital due to its for-profit status and the changing of the land from being zoned for residential development. Of course she is opposed to the hospital; she is a member of the Good Samaritan Hospital Board of Directors. The fact that the land is zoned as residential has no real standing in this debate. Most land that is annexed into a city is at first zoned as a residential area. The city council then goes back later to change the zoning laws to allow development. Another citizen opposed to the hospital mentioned that the building of a hospital would cause the city to lose land that promotes wildlife. How does building a hospital lose any more wildlife space than building a residential neighborhood? If the hospital is not built it will only be a matter of time before new houses are built in the area. Although one house many not take up as much space as a hospital, a large neighborhood does.

One of the biggest arguments against building Kearney Regional Hospital is that it will hurt the quality of health care in central Nebraska. I fail to see how competition can hurt the quality of health care. If anything, the new hospital will force Good Samaritan to provide better service to the community. For-profit hospitals are often condemned for trying to make more money off of their patients, but the truth is that the for-profit status encourages efficiency and usually leads to cheaper health care costs. I think that the city council needs to look carefully at this issue and not allow Catholic Health Initiatives to intimidate them into voting against the hospital. A second hospital may very well be a bad idea for Kearney, but it is not up to the other hospital to make this decision for us.

Friday, February 19, 2010

Sinner

I decided that this year for Lent I would give up Lent. I know that this doesn't really count, but it makes me feel better than saying I simply don't care. At least this way I can still say that I actually gave up something. I have never been good at remembering to not eat meat on Fridays, and I usually end up making it a few weeks before breaking my Lenten promise anyway. I guess I fail to see how giving something up and not eating meat on Fridays makes me a better person. I actually think it makes me a worse person. I usually end up getting cranky and being an even more mean spirited person than usual. I decided to do us all a favor this year and skip all of it. I may be going to hell for doing it, but I am pretty sure that there are other people doing things worse than eating a hamburger on a Friday.

Monday, February 15, 2010

The Olympics help me cope


I am someone that hates winter, so at this time every year I start to get really tired of the crappy Nebraska weather. If you had asked me this time last week I would have told you that I was completely sick of winter, but something has changed since then that is helping me cope: The Olympics. It never fails that once every four years I enjoy winter for about two weeks. Watching all of the winter sports makes me appreciate all that winter has to offer, even though many of those sports can't be enjoyed in Nebraska due to our general lack of anything interesting.

While the Olympics are helping me deal with the mid-winter blues, they are taking a toll on my productivity. I have absolutely no desire to do anything else but watch television. I wish I could call in sick to work and school for two weeks so I could sit on the couch and watch the games. Who am I kidding . . . I wish I could avoid work and school to watch TV all the time.

Friday, February 12, 2010

Why I gave a crap about this year's Super Bowl

We should get one thing straight right off the bat: I hate pro football.

Now that we have that cleared up, I can tell you why I cared slightly about this year's Super Bowl. For the first time that I can remember, I actually cared about who won the game, because of two reasons:

1. I think Peyton Manning is a turd.
2. New Orleans needs something to be happy about for a change.


Peyton Manning has always been near the top of my list of athletes I can't stand. I think he is incredibly full of himself, and I wanted nothing more than for him to get knocked on his rear-end. The Saints were underdogs that many thought had no chance of winning against Manning and the Colts, and I was cheering for them to prove people wrong. After everything that the people of New Orleans have been through, they deserve to have something to celebrate.

I am ecstatic for the people of New Orleans. It is their time to shine. With the momentum of the Super Bowl win behind them and Mardi Gras coming up, they are ready to show the rest of the country that they are back on their feet. There are few times when a simple football game can hold so much more meaning for the winning team than a trophy and a paycheck. If the Colts had won, we would have all had to endure countless "I am amazing" interviews with Peyton Manning. We should all be thankful that everything turned out the way it did.

Congratulations, New Orleans!!

The time has come to let go

By Matt Kovar


When the Nebraska State Fair was moved from Lincoln to Grand Island two years ago, many citizens were upset about the decision. There were those in Lincoln that did not want to lose the fair, and those in Grand Island that were concerned about the costs of the new facilities. Over time most people have accepted the fate of the fair, and have begun to move on with their lives as usual.


Many people in eastern parts of the state have voiced their discontent with the move. They have a right to be upset about losing the fair, but there comes a time when complaining becomes unproductive. There have been several attempts to stop the move of the fair through the Nebraska court system. These multiple attempts have been rejected, but this has not stopped opposition groups from talking their case to the Nebraska Supreme Court. The leader of the opposition group has acknowledged that even if the court declares that the law moving the fair to Grand Island unconstitutional the fair will most likely move forward in Grand Island as planned. This is due to the fact that the new facilities are well into construction and most of the equipment at State Fair Park in Lincoln has been sold. Moving the State Fair back to Lincoln would cost such a large amount of money that the fair would most likely be too unstable to survive.


Many of the opposition group members feel that by giving the fair to Grand Island the Legislature gave an unfair advantage to the central part of the state. This may be true, but the fact remains that Lincoln and Omaha have the advantage in almost every situation due to their size and location. Lincoln will certainly not go into a downward spiral because it lost a struggling fair being held in worn-out facilities. The new facilities being built in Grand Island are set to be among the most advanced in the nation, and will bring more attention to the agricultural aspects of the fair, which is what Nebraska is known for. It makes little sense to have an agricultural fair in a predominantly urban area. Relocating the fair to Grand Island is a smart move.


The best bet that Nebraska has at keeping its fair is to support the efforts of Grand Island and the State Fair Board. In order for the fair to survive it is necessary that the public not only support the fair, but attend it. While the people of Grand Island have begun to embrace the fair, the smaller population base in and around the city is not enough to supply the necessary attendance that the fair needs to succeed. People from all parts of the state, including Lincoln and Omaha, need to help Grand Island welcome the fair. If the Nebraska Supreme Court overturns the law moving the fair it may not stop the fair from moving, but it will most lessen public support and cause the fair to struggle from the start.


The people of Nebraska must stop fighting the move of the Nebraska State Fair and start supporting Grand Island in its efforts to bring Nebraska a better fair. To those that support the court case attempting to stop the move we remind you that the State Fair has moved on, and so should you.

Wednesday, February 10, 2010

Waste of Court Time


In the article Court verdict may not matter in state fairgrounds move from the Lincoln Journal Star, the fact is mentioned that whatever the Nebraska Supreme Court decides, it will most likely make no difference. The initiator of the court case admitted that even if the law that moved the fair to Grand Island was deemed unconstitutional, the State Fair Board would most likely go on with the construction of the fair as it is. I fail to see how hearing a case that will have no real impact whatsoever is in the best interest of Nebraskans.

I completely understand the views of those in Lincoln that are upset that the State Fair has been moved, but the time has come to stop fighting. Many have mentioned that the law that moved the fair was unconstitutional because it gave Grand Island an advantage over Lincoln. I find this a total load of bull. The cities of Lincoln and Omaha will always have an advantage over anywhere else in the state simply because of their size and location. Moving one event away from a city that has much more going for it than Grand Island will not destroy Lincoln.

Saturday, February 6, 2010

Wanted: Public Support

This article from the "Grand Island Independent" focuses on the progress being made at Fonner Park in Grand Island to ensure that the new State Fair Park is ready for the opening of the fair in August. All of the buildings but one are to be completed before the fair begins, and most of them are partially completed already. The new State Fair Park is set to be one of the most advanced in the nation, and will be much nicer than the run-down facilities that were used in Lincoln.

The article also addressed the concerns that many had when the fair was first moved that there would not be enough support for the fair in Grand Island. Joseph McDermott, executive director of the Nebraska State Fair said that the biggest way to ensure that the fair is a success is participation. Without the support of the public the fair will not thrive in Grand Island or anywhere else. People need to go to the fair in order for vendors and other businesses to invest in the future of the event. When the move was announced there were many people in Grand Island that didn't want the fair and said that it would fail miserably. When I heard these comments I was discouraged, because if someone wants something to fail bad enough, it will. If Grand Island and the rest of the state decide not to support the fair than it will fail. The best way to ensure that the fair is successful is simply to go and enjoy it.